New teachers, whether new to the team or the department, are also users of these assignments; however, because they were not present at the conception of some unit, they often receive the assignments and all their handouts with little guidance and no real room to make these assignments their own in some meaningful way. Trying to teach a unit others developed is, for most teachers, similar to putting together furniture from IKEA; it’s difficult to use others’ materials and methods to teach writing. But it is problematic for another reason: It prevents the teachers from feeling any sense of ownership, undermines their investment in the unit or writing assignment, and effectively excludes them and their voice from the assignment.
To foster a conversation and culture of collaboration, it is vital that assignments not be treated as though they were written in stone. How could they be when the kids and conditions we work with change so much each year? When the constraints within which we work change every year in subtle but substantive ways that inevitably affect what we do and how we do it? When world events demand that we move that 1984 unit up to the fall during the election year? When we suddenly have a class set of Chromebooks to use every day and are challenged to use them in ways that will make a difference? When the unit that challenged all students so well last year challenges so few this year? And sometimes we get all these variations packed into one year, so it seems as if we are teaching, as I did one year, completely different classes. Yet we cannot create separate assignments for three different classes.
We can, however, allow students meaningful choices so that they can challenge themselves at the level appropriate to their current performance and thereby increase their level of engagement.
…
Learn more about The Six Academic Writing Assignments at Heinemann.com