<img height="1" width="1" alt="" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=940171109376247&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Dedicated to Teachers


An Argument for Cross-Disciplinary Learning

NoMoreScienceKits_OneEvery year the amount of content that teachers need to address grows. On the one hand, teachers feel the pressures of tested subjects, and on the other, a growing list of expectations for what students may experience, depending on the school: health education, school garden, English language development, cooking, engineering design, art, sex education, coding, drug education, music, cursive writing, technology, drama, and so on. Whatever your opinion of the relative importance of these different domains of learning, it is clear that piling on more and more expectations for what students should learn without thoughtful integration and time allocation is a losing strategy. Indeed, teachers who integrate science with other subject areas spend nearly 30 percent more time teaching science than teachers who reported rarely or never integrating science with other subject areas (Dorph et al. 2010, 19).

Download a sample chapter!

Fortunately, contemporary standards that have been the result of the movement for fewer, clearer, higher standards (Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation 2010; Rothman 2013) provide help in dealing with this dilemma. These newer standards, and the many sets of state standards that they have inspired, focus on the practices of literacy, mathematics, and science: what literate people, mathematicians, and scientists do. They also emphasize common elements of what rigorous performance looks like across multiple disciplines. Certain standards in one discipline even sound remarkably as if they would have belonged in another discipline. Consider these:

  • Describe a relationship between a series of scientific ideas or concepts, or steps in technical procedures in a text, using language that pertains to time, sequence, and cause/effect.

  • Make strategic use of digital media and visual displays of data to express information and enhance understanding of presentations.

  • Follow precisely a multi-step procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks.

These shared practices can become a strategic place to invest time, helping to resolve the pressures of a bursting-at-the-seams curriculum. This focus does more to support our students as they confront the rapidly changing world, also. The goal of our education system can no longer be to impart a set body of scientific knowledge—we must prepare our young people to exist in a society with an ever-changing base of knowledge and to be ready to solve problems that we don’t yet know about.

The above has been adapted from No More Science Kits or Texts in Isolation. Click here to pre-order your copy!

Download a sample chapter!


glyph-logo_May2016Follow us on Instagram @heinemannpub to stay up to date on the latest books, your favorite authors, and upcoming events!


Jacqueline Barber is co-author of No More Science Kits or Texts in Isolation and Director of the Learning Design Group at the University of California, Berkeley's Lawrence Hall of Science.

 

 

 

 

Gina Cervetti is coauthor of No More Science Kits or Texts in Isolation and a co-author of Comprehension Going Forward.

An assistant professor of Curriculum and Instruction at University of Colorado Boulder, she teaches graduate-level courses on reading instruction and assessment. The focus of Gina’s work over the last decade has been on students’ development of academic literacies with a particular focus on reading comprehension—and, more recently, talk— in science. In particular, she has been exploring the question, How can literacy instruction be made more authentic, powerful, knowledge-enriching, and personally meaningful through integration with content-area instruction? 

Posted by: Katie FabianoPublished:

Topics: Not This But That, Jacqueline Barber, Gina Cervetti, No More Science Kits or Texts in Isolation

Comment on this post:

Related Posts

The Teacher's Role in Math Fact Fluency

In classrooms where students are successfully learning their number facts, you'll see teachers listening ...
Katie Fabiano Jul 9, 2019 1:55:08 PM

The Phases of Learning Facts for Addition and Subtraction

Learning arithmetic facts well takes years. Adults use retrieval in only a fraction of situations. But ev...
Steph George May 21, 2019 8:26:00 AM

Teaching for Authentic Fluency, Not Rote Memorization

Anyone who wishes to be mathematically proficient needs to “just know” simple arithmetic — 4 + 9 = 13, fo...
Steph George Apr 22, 2019 8:04:00 AM